The legal issue of jammers is a frequently discussed topic. As we discussed before, the laws regarding interference vary in different countries. First of all, what we want to say is that every signal jammer has been introduced into the public society from the beginning. Later the government began to realize that this might pose a threat to society, so people decided to restrict this equipment. The main reason is that especially people can use it to complain in inappropriate places, and secondly-even if they are terrorists, almost everyone can get a portable frequency blocker, which increases the chance of such attacks. But on the other hand, the same technology is protecting global public spaces in improvised explosive devices. The same technology has also saved dozens of lives in Iraq and Afghanistan.
To sum up, we believe that things are both sides. Jammer is a tool, it is not dangerous, the key is how to use it. Like tools and weapons, they have a stronger ability to attack than humiliation, but in many places, the law (especially tools) is legal, won't the government allow us to use a machete? Similarly, WiFi jammers can be used by criminals. For example, stealing cars can use remote control jammers, but it can also be used to protect our privacy or just as a joke device.
Unfortunately, most governments don't think so. They decide that because one of these signal blockers is dangerous, all these devices should be restricted. Therefore, it is best to find out all the information about your local laws. We think these types of equipment and legal issues should be changed, just because we want to know that we have freedom and we can do anything to protect our privacy. There are many ways to meet people, but no one can protect his rights and privacy in the only legal way-this is also an important reason for the reasonable use of disruptors.